Achieving Goals: Integrating the Fragmented United States Federal Food Safety System into a Food Protection System
The United States (U.S.) food protection system is fragmented across federal, state, and local jurisdictions, resulting in duplication, inefficiency, and systemic failures that undermine public health and erode consumer trust. Foodborne pathogens such as Listeria, Salmonella, and E. coli do not respect institutional boundaries, yet responsibility for oversight is divided among more than 15 federal agencies, 75 state entities, and thousands of local jurisdictions, operating under more than 30 laws and 70 interagency agreements. This structure has proven incapable of reducing the persistent burden of foodborne illness in the U.S. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate one in six Americans is affected annually, causing 10 million illnesses, 53,000 hospitalizations, and more than 900 deaths.
The term food protection, in use since at least 1924, conceptually unifies food safety, defense, authenticity, and infrastructure protection. However, the lack of an integrated federal entity has perpetuated disjointed responses. The 2025 recall of chicken fettuccine alfredo meals—linked to 17 illnesses, 16 hospitalizations, three deaths, and one fetal loss (as of this date)—illustrates the shortcomings of the system. Oversight was split between the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which regulated the non-meat components, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), which oversaw the chicken ingredient. Despite involvement from CDC, the outbreak was not contained in time to prevent fatalities. Similarly, the 2024 deli meat Listeria outbreak, responsible for 10 deaths and 61 illnesses, highlighted the failure of FSIS to enforce corrective actions despite documented ongoing sanitation-based violations. These preventable events underscore the limitations of the current model.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has repeatedly called for consolidation—in 2005 and again 20 years later in 2025—emphasizing that inefficiencies, regulatory conflicts, and siloed data hindering effective food protection, resulting in preventable public health impacts. Reports also document how FSIS’s 6,500-employee continuous inspection program expends enormous resources without measurably improving outcomes. Decentralized data management further impedes trend analysis, predictive modeling, and risk-based decision-making that could anticipate and prevent outbreaks.
A unified federal food protection entity would provide structural and scientific coherence, resulting in the desired outcomes described herein. By consolidating regulatory authority, streamlining enforcement, and centralizing data, such an entity could accelerate response times, enhance accountability, and foster consistent risk-based regulation. Integrating modern technologies such as artificial intelligence and predictive analytics would strengthen surveillance, while harmonized training and inspections would maximize public health protections and reduce duplication and industry burden. Examples from Canada and the United Kingdom—both of which have lower per-capita illness rates—demonstrate the effectiveness of nationally unified food protection systems.
Congressional recognition of these systemic weaknesses has spurred legislative proposals in 2025 to establish a single food protection authority. This initiative reflects both scientific necessity and policy urgency. A consolidated approach would align regulatory practice with the realities of microbial ecology, supply chain complexity, and consumer demand for safe and wholesome foods.
In conclusion, the U.S. food protection system requires modernization and unification. Reform should focus on five core directives:
- Improving public health through risk-based regulation
- Eliminating overlap and duplication
- Streamlining enforcement and compliance
- Increasing accountability and modernizing governance
- Strengthening food protection as a component of national security
A unified federal food protection entity would provide a vision forward with four prime outcomes:
- Protect public health more effectively
- Reduce regulatory and economic burden
- Improve resilience against both natural and intentional threats
- Deliver a modern, science-based food protection system for the 21st century and beyond
“One system, one standard, one mission: Protecting America’s food supply from farm to fork.”
—Guiding principle for U.S. food safety efforts, FSIS
Click on the image to download the complete 45 page Whitepaper:
ICYMI: Click on the image to watch this recorded webinar with two of the Whitepaper Authors, Jason Bashura and Ben Reading:
Related Articles
-
From food safety and quality to food defense, integrity, and physical and digital security, the system continues to operate in silos. More than ever, there is the need for a unified, risk-based U.S. food protection system.
-
This legislation would put one agency clearly in charge with the singular mission of protecting the food supply with the resources, staff, and focus to achieve that goal. A single food safety agency, with a Senate-confirmed Commissioner, will strengthen oversight…
-
Food Safety 4.0 represents a new operating philosophy, not simply a new set of tools. I introduce this term intentionally and for the first time, recognizing that language shapes action. What an organization names, it prioritizes; what it prioritizes, it…
-
The course, developed and facilitated by Dr. Mehrdad Tajkarimi, DVM, MPVM, Ph.D., blends science-driven methodologies with real-world application. It equips quality directors, HACCP coordinators, operations managers, technical staff, compliance officers, and other food safety leaders with the skills to conduct…
