Part V: FSMA IQ Test
![]()
![Question mark](https://foodsafetytech.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/question-mark.jpg)
The following are the results of Part IV of the FSMA IQ Test. Haven’t taken it yet? Click here to take Part IV. Under the results is Part V of the IQ test, the results of which will be posted next week.
Part IV results:
- FSMA requires that verification and validation include a documented internal audit verifying monitoring of food safety plan, as prescribed, including all associated control instruments. TRUE
- FSMA preventive controls does not require hazards be addressed under the HACCP plan. FALSE
- The food safety plan does not require hazards that are unintentionally introduced within an operation’s processes. FALSE
- You must implement written programs to conduct reanalysis of food safety plan as a whole at least every three years. TRUE
- A designated employee training must conduct the verification of the food safety plan, as needed. FALSE
- Control limits must be included within the hazard analysis and preventive controls for HACCP. FALSE
Create your own user feedback survey
About The Author
Food Safety Tech Staff
Innovative Publishing Company, Inc.
The Food Safety Tech staff consists of freelance journalists and industry contributing writers with decades of experience in covering food safety issues under the categories of compliance, food laboratory and manufacturing processes and technologies, foodservice and retail, regulations and sustainability.
You can contact our writing staff via our Contact Page