Tag Archives: USDA

CDC, FDA, USDA logos
Beltway Beat

DeLauro, Durbin Reintroduce the Federal Food Administration Act

By Food Safety Tech Staff
No Comments
CDC, FDA, USDA logos

On December 10, 2025, Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (CT-03) and Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) reintroduced the Federal Food Administration Act, legislation that would streamline our food safety system by consolidating food oversight into a single agency dedicated to keeping the foods Americans eat safe.

“We need a single food safety agency to ensure the food Americans eat is safe,” said DeLauro. “Currently, food safety oversight is scattered across multiple agencies with the bulk of the responsibility falling to the Food and Drug Administration – where food safety has often been treated like a second-class citizen. This legislation would put one agency clearly in charge with the singular mission of protecting our food supply with the resources, staff, and focus to achieve that goal. I am proud to partner with Senator Durbin in this effort, because Americans deserve peace of mind that the government is keeping companies accountable with clear, consistent safety standards.”

“The sad reality is that FDA has failed to protect Americans from preventable foodborne illnesses and death. In recent years, the FDA has failed to protect babies from bacterial infections in their infant formula and lead-tainted applesauce pouches,” said Durbin. “This is why Congresswoman DeLauro and I are introducing legislation to create a Federal Food Administration.  With the Federal Food Administration Act, we hope our nation will have greater success in protecting the foods in our kids’ lunch boxes and on our dining room tables.”

FDA regulates approximately 80 percent of our food supply. Consumers and companies depend on FDA to perform its regulatory role effectively.  Yet, despite increased authorities included in the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) and the creation of the Human Foods Program at FDA, the agency has failed to make significant inroads in reducing rates of foodborne illness and death in the U.S.

About one in six Americans—or 48 million people—get sick from a foodborne illness each year.  According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 128,000 Americans also are hospitalized and 3,000 Americans die of foodborne diseases each year.

A single food safety agency, with a Senate-confirmed Commissioner, will strengthen oversight of the food supply, improve the health and well-being of Americans, and ensure companies that cut corners on food safety are properly held accountable.

Joining Durbin and DeLauro as original cosponsors of this legislation is Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and U.S. Representative Sara Jacobs.

The legislation is endorsed by Consumer Reports, Consumer Federation of America, Environmental Working Group, and STOP Foodborne Illness.

USDA Logo
Beltway Beat

Politics has no place in the USDA’s mission or leadership

By Rick Biros
No Comments
USDA Logo

There is an unusual banner on the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s website that was most likely written by USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins, which the message is similar to her posts on X and other public comments.

USDA.gov Screen Shot 2025-11-06 at 12.16.12 PM

I shared the screen shot image with Sandra Eskin, CEO, Stop Foodborne Illness and former Deputy Under Secretary for Food Safety at USDA. In this role, Sandy led the Office of Food Safety at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, overseeing the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

Sandra Eskin
Sandra Eskin, CEO, Stop Foodborne Illness

Sandy commented that “Government departments and agencies serve all citizens – republicans and democrats. This type of partisan rhetoric undermines trust in government and may violate the law.”

Sandy is correct, the USDA serves all citizens, regardless of political party. The mission of the USDA is provide leadership on food, agriculture, natural resources, rural development, nutrition, and related issues based on public policy, the best available science, and effective management.

According to the USDA’s website, when President Abraham Lincoln established the United States Department of Agriculture, he called it the “People’s Department.” The website goes on to say “At USDA we are working tirelessly to be a model department that serves all people of our great Nation.”

Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke L. Rollins

Is Secretary Rollins breaking the law? Maybe. The Hatch Act, applies to employees working in the executive branch of the federal government. The purpose of the Act is to maintain federal workforce that is free from partisan political influence or coercion. The Act covers messages in federal buildings but does not mention federal websites.

Regardless of the legality, Secretary Rollins’ political message is inappropriate and that this type of partisan rhetoric undermines the hard work of the very people who work for her. When USDA employees return to work, they are already dealing with  low moral and reduced resources. Their jobs are hard enough. Undermining  trust in the government only makes things worse.

Good bosses are like good coaches. You motivate your players to perform at the highest level, no matter what the odds are. My message to Secretary Rollins… step up and be a good leader. Stop the political rhetoric, blame game and excuses. Take ownership of the situation. Motivate your team and instill confidence in your agency to be the model department that you say you are… that serves all people of our great Nation.

 

 

CDC, FDA, USDA logos
Ask The Expert

Seeing the Forest Through the Trees: Advancing Integration in the U.S. Food Protection System

By Rick Biros
No Comments
CDC, FDA, USDA logos

Calls to integrate the regulatory oversight of the U.S. food system have been echoed for decades through studies, reports, and policy forums—yet meaningful change has remained elusive. While the FDA’s recent creation of the Office of Inspections and Investigations marks an important step toward more coordinated oversight, the USDA’s FSIS still lacks a parallel structure, and significant gaps persist across the broader food protection landscape.

From food safety and quality to food defense, food integrity, and physical and digital security, the farm to fork system continues to operate in silos. This fragmentation not only creates regulatory confusion for industry stakeholders but also fuels inconsistent enforcement and mixed messages for consumers potentially leading to negative public health impacts and loss of consumer trust due to confusing recall messages—exemplified by the widely cited disparity in how cheese and pepperoni pizzas are regulated by different federal agencies.

This topic will be discussed at the Food Safety Consortium conference in Alexandria VA., October 19-21. Panelists include Benjamin Reading, Ph.D. Interim Assistant Director, NC Agricultural Research Service (NCARS) Associate Professor & University Faculty Scholar, North Carolina State University and Jason Bashura, M.P.H., RS, a 25+ yrs. public health and food protection professional. Ben and Jason discuss the need for truly unified, risk-based U.S. food protection system in this 26 minute recorded webinar. To watch the video, click on the image below or this link: Watch the Webinar.

Ben and Jason discuss the need for truly unified, risk-based U.S. food protection system in this 26 minute recorded webinar

After watching the video, we invite you to take a quick 5 question survey on this topic. You can win a chance to receive a complimentary registration to the Food Safety Consortium by correctly identifying the number of times Jason says the two words “Food Protection” in the webinar. Click here to take the Survey.

The session at the Food Safety Consortium will convene leaders from regulatory agencies, industry, academia, and NGOs to explore the structural and operational challenges that continue to hinder integration. Through their collective insights, attendees will gain a deeper understanding of what a truly unified, risk-based food protection system could look like, why such a system is needed now more than ever, and how emerging solutions—both policy-based and practical—can help close longstanding gaps.

By moving beyond agency silos and outdated jurisdictional lines, this session challenges participants to rethink what it means to protect the food supply and to consider how collaboration can turn complexity into clarity. This is the next step in seeing the forest through the trees—and laying the groundwork for a smarter, more resilient food protection system.

The Food Safety Consortium, presented by Food Safety Tech and the American Frozen Food Institute (AFFI) will take place October 19-21, 2025, at the Crystal Gateway Marriott, Arlington VA directly across the Potomac River from  Washington, DC. The Program starts with several pre-conference workshops and training which leads into two full days of high-level panel discussions and educational presentations that will be sure to open your mind and expose you to a variety of topics, ideas and like-minded Food PROTECTION professionals who will be in attendance.

For a limited time, you can receive a 10% discount off registration by entering the discount code FoodProtection. Visit FoodSafetyConsortium.org

AOAC International
Beltway Beat

AOAC INTERNATIONAL and USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service Establish MOU for Food Test Methods

By Food Safety Tech Staff
No Comments
AOAC International

In a press release, AOAC INTERNATIONAL (AOAC) and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in June. This MOU establishes a strategic framework for developing, validating, and recognizing methods FSIS laboratories, as well as regulated establishments, use to verify the effectiveness of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) based food safety systems.

FSIS is part of a science-based national public health system to ensure food safety and food defense in the United States. FSIS ensures food safety through the authorities of the Federal Meat Inspection Act, the Poultry Products Inspection Act, and the Egg Products Inspection Act, as well as humane animal handling through the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act.

“This new MOU with FSIS marks a pivotal step forward in our shared commitment to promote public health,” said David B. Schmidt, AOAC Executive Director. “By strengthening our collaboration, we are facilitating an even more resilient food safety system—one that ensures regulatory testing is backed by science, vigilance, and trusted methods.”

The MOU outlines how AOAC and FSIS will work together cooperatively where mutual interests have been identified, including collaboration on scientific method training and other educational initiatives; development of Standard Method Performance Requirements (SMPRs®) documents, validation guidance and/or method validation protocols; development of proficiency testing programs; and adoption or certification of methods for specific regulations or monitoring programs, such as Salmonella quantification. Once methods are validated through AOAC Official Methods of AnalysisSM (OMA) or Performance Tested MethodsSM (PTM) programs, there will be greater confidence that methods are fit for purpose and can be used by FSIS laboratories and constituents for applicable testing needs.

“The involvement of FSIS experts in the development of AOAC standards and evaluation of methods submitted for method conformity assessment through AOAC OMA and PTM programs is very important for ensuring their fitness for purpose from both scientific and regulatory perspectives,” said Katerina Mastovska, Ph.D., AOAC Deputy Executive Director and Chief Science Officer.

Beltway Beat

Dr. Denise Eblen, Administrator, USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) to present at the Food Safety Consortium

No Comments

Donna Garren, Ph.D., Executive Vice President of Science & Policy at AFFI who co-chairs the Food Safety Consortium program committee confirmed that Dr. Denise Eblen, Administrator, U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) will present at the Food Safety Consortium Conference, October 19-21 in Washington DC.

Dr. Eblen will outline FSIS’ vision for advancing food safety through science-based policymaking, enhanced surveillance, and streamlined regulatory frameworks. She will offer updates on USDA’s strategies to reduce the burden of foodborne pathogens in meat and poultry products. Equally important, this session will emphasize the critical role of stakeholder engagement. Attendees will hear how industry leaders, state regulators, consumer advocates, and academic partners can actively participate in shaping policy—ensuring that new regulations are practical, effective, and rooted in collaboration.

Dr. Emilio Esteban, Chief Scientific Officer for Mérieux NutriSciences’ North America division, and Head of its Global Analytical Hub and former Undersecretary for Food Safety at USDA is the opening keynote speaker. The closing keynote speaker is Ricky Dickson, Author and Former CEO of Blue Bell Creameries.

The full program is available at FoodSafetyConsortium.org

Listeria
Ask The Expert

Listeria-related Regulations, FDA & USDA

By Bob Lijana
No Comments
Listeria

To enforce food safety regulations, FDA and USDA have a “zero tolerance” policy for Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in certain foods. This means Lm must not be found in any 25-gram sample. According to FDA’s Compliance Policy Guide, legal action may be recommended if Lm is found in a ready-to-eat (RTE) food that allows Lm to grow. While the compliance guide is not legally binding, the finding of Lm in your facility could still lead to enforcement by FDA.

Do note that this is a regulatory policy. It does not mean that the typical healthy individual cannot tolerate Lm. Quite the contrary, as recognized by other countries (such as New Zealand, Canada, and the European Union), some foodstuffs are allowed up to 100 CFU/gm of Lm (although the EU tolerance is supposed to change to “not detectable in 25 gm” as of June 1, 2026). For some foods, Japan allows even higher levels. Because of these higher limits, some people believe that allowing some level of Lm in a food is a very practical approach.

That said, the USA does not. Any food company—big or small—can face public health warnings, safety alerts, product withdrawals, or recalls because of Lm. No one is exempt if something goes wrong with how food is handled or processed.

Unfortunately, even with past mistakes and costly recalls, Lm-related recalls still occur. Some recent examples:

  • July 2025: recall of over 350,000 lb of turkey bacon (Kraft Heinz—Oscar Mayer).
  • June 2025: recall of chicken alfredo meals; at least 16 people hospitalized; at least 2 deaths (FreshRealm–Kroger and Walmart).
  • May 2025: recall of nearly 90 vending machine sandwiches and other products; at least 10 people hospitalized (Fresh & Ready Foods).
  • Apr 2025: recall of nearly 2,000 cases of ready to eat celery sticks (Duda Farms).
  • Feb 2025: recall of frozen supplement shakes; 12 deaths (Lyons Magnus–Sysco).
  • Jan 2025: recall of 2,000,000 cases of doughnuts and pastries (FGF Brands–Dunkin).
  • Oct 2024: recall of 12,000,000 lb of pre-cooked meat and poultry (Bruce Pack).
  • Oct 2024: recall of 200 varieties of frozen waffles and pancakes (Treehouse Foods—Food Lion, Harris Teeter, Publix).
  • Aug 2024: recall of 7,200,000 lb of sliced deli meats; 10 deaths (Boars Head).
  • Feb 2024: recall of 50 different cheese products; 2 deaths (Rizo Lopez Foods—Albertson’s, Trader Joe’s).

Even if one disagrees with the scientific basis for a “zero-tolerance” approach, all regulations require an ongoing vigilance to Lm presence in the plant environment (and of course in the food). This includes non-regulatory food safety schemes such as SQF (Safe Quality Foods). The current SQF Code (which is being updated for 2026) includes a requirement for a risk-based environmental monitoring program for pathogen detection, sampling, and eradication. To help in this regard, both FDA (“draft guidance for industry”) and USDA (“compliance guideline”) have excellent technical guidance documents. These publicly-available resources cover the microbiological aspects of Lm, how to identify Lm, and how to assess risks in order to determine appropriate preventive and corrective actions.

Regulators also use DNA testing in their quest to find root sources of Lm. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is like testing for one’s ancestry. Listeria samples can be categorized based on their genetic (DNA) makeup. With an extensive database (e.g., PulseNet) FDA may be able to link the DNA from a Lm environmental sample in a plant with the DNA from a blood sample from someone who has been hospitalized with listeriosis. If FDA can also determine that the food was purchased in the same state as the plant is located and/or that the hospitalized person said that they ate that specific food, then FDA can link everything together.

Food manufacturers need to be aware of how WGS can affect their operations. A publication on this topic provides useful perspective from FDA’s point of view and the manufacturer’s point of view. These do not always align.

Regulations help protect the public health. Use these regulations as guides to protect the food you make.

See the Related Articles below to read the series.

To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety Tech’s weekly Newsletter, click here

Lettuce

USDA Announces National Farm Security Action Plan

By Food Safety Tech Staff
No Comments
Lettuce

In a press release today, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, and U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem announced the next pillar of her Make Agriculture Great Again initiative: USDA’s National Farm Security Action Plan. This plan elevates American agriculture as a key element of the nation’s national security, addressing urgent threats from foreign adversaries and strengthening the resilience of the nation’s food and agricultural systems.

The National Farm Security Action Plan takes aggressive action across seven critical areas.

  1. Secure and Protect American Farmland – Address U.S. foreign farmland ownership from adversaries head on. Total transparency. Tougher penalties.
  2. Enhance Agricultural Supply Chain Resilience – Refocus domestic investment into key manufacturing sectors and identify non-adversarial partners to work with when domestic production is not available. Plan for contingencies.
  3. Protect U.S. Nutrition Safety Net from Fraud and Foreign Exploitation – Billions have been stolen by foreign crime rings.
  4. Defend Agricultural Research and Innovation – No more sweetheart deals or secret pacts with hostile nations. American ideas stay in America.
  5. Put America First in Every USDA Program – From farm loans to food safety, every program will reflect the America First agenda.
  6. Safeguard Plant and Animal Health – Crack down on bio-threats before they ever reach our soil.
  7. Protect Critical Infrastructure – Farms, food, and supply chains are national security assets—and will be treated as such.

This National Farm Security Action Plan will serve as the launch point for USDA to work in further unison with governors, state legislators, and federal partners to further integrate agriculture into the broader national security efforts over the coming months and years reaffirming the critical nature of agriculture and the need for a cross governmental approach. Defending access to American abundance and preserving the American experiment is the essence of agriculture security – and it is why farm security is national security.

Beltway Beat

Trump Nominates Mindy Brashears to Second Term as USDA’s Under Secretary for Food Safety

By Food Safety Tech Staff
No Comments

Mindy Brashears, the former Under Secretary for Food Safety at the U.S. Department of Agriculture has been nominated again for a second term by Trump. For her first term she was nominated by Trump and confirmed by a Senate vote on March 23, 2020 and concluded her service on January 20, 2021. Dr. Emilio Esteban, currently the Chief Scientific Officer for Mérieux NutriSciences’ North America division, and Head of its Global Analytical Hub was the Undersecretary for Food Safety at USDA who succeeded Brashears.

Her responsibilities as Under Secretary included leading the nation’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) and its team of over 10,000 food inspectors and scientists. She chaired the Codex Alimentarius Policy Committee, which made her the highest-ranking food safety official in the U.S. government during her tenure.

Following her time at USDA, she returned to her role as professor of food microbiology and food safety at Texas Tech University where she is the director for the International Center for Food Industry Excellence

Brashears nomination for the Senate confirmation process is now before the Senate Committee on Agriculture. A hearing date has not yet been scheduled.

 

Beltway Beat

Senator Tom Cotton Introduces Bill to Unify Food Safety Agencies

No Comments

Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) introduced the Study And Framework for Efficiency in Food Oversight and Organizational Design (SAFE FOOD) Act, legislation that would direct the Department of Agriculture to conduct a study on the consolidation of federal agencies that have a primary role in ensuring food safety into a single agency.

The Bill states that not later than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall conduct a study on the consolidation of Federal agencies with a primary role in ensuring food safety in the United States (including the Food Safety and Inspection Service, the Food and Drug Administration, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) into a single agency.

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing the results of the study; and any recommendations of the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to the consolidation.

Full text of the bill may be found here.

Beltway Beat

USDA FSIS Withdraws Proposed Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products

By Food Safety Tech Staff
No Comments

FSIS announced in a Notice of Withdrawal on the Federal Register dated April 25, 2025 that it is withdrawing the “Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products” proposed rule and proposed determination to allow the Agency to further assess its approach for addressing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products.

The Notice gave the background and in August 7, 2024, FSIS published a proposed rule and proposed determination in the Federal Register titled “Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products” (89 FR 64678). The proposed framework was targeted at reducing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products.

The proposal announced FSIS’ proposed determination that raw chicken carcasses, chicken parts, comminuted chicken, and comminuted turkey products contaminated with certain Salmonella levels and serotypes are adulterated as defined in the Poultry Products Inspection Act (PPIA) (21 U.S.C. 453 et seq.). FSIS proposed to establish final product standards based on these Salmonella levels and serotypes.

FSIS also proposed to revise the regulations in 9 CFR 381.65(g) that require that all poultry slaughter establishments develop, implement, and maintain written procedures to prevent contamination by enteric pathogens throughout the entire slaughter and dressing operation to clarify that these procedures must include a microbial monitoring program (MMP) that incorporates statistical process control (SPC) monitoring methods, to require sampling at rehang instead of pre-chill, and to require that all establishments conduct paired sampling at rehang and post-chill.

The Agency proposed to amend the recordkeeping requirements under 9 CFR 381.65(h) to require that establishments submit their microbial monitoring sampling results to FSIS electronically. FSIS had considered proposing to require that incoming flocks meet a predetermined target level for Salmonella at receiving. However, at the time the proposal was published, the research did not support the use of a threshold for test results at the receiving step and many small poultry producers and processors said that such an approach would impose an overwhelming burden on them.

Therefore, the proposed framework focused on a non-regulatory approach for reducing the Salmonella load on incoming birds. FSIS received 7,089 comments on the proposed framework during the comment period, which closed on January 17, 2025. Most of the comments were submitted as part of organized letter writing campaigns, while 1,415 were unique comment letters.

“The decision to withdraw the Salmonella Poultry framework sends the clear message that the Make America Healthy initiative does not care about the thousands of people who get sick from preventable foodborne Salmonella infections linked to poultry. The proposal was developed with robust stakeholder input and the decision to withdraw it was made before FSIS even had an opportunity to review the extensive docket.”  Sandra Eskin, CEO of Stop Foodborne Illness and former Deputy Under Secretary Food Safety, USDA, FSISFSIS received substantive comments from a variety of stakeholders that included poultry and meat industry trade associations, small poultry producer and processor trade associations, large and small poultry processing establishments, consumer advocacy organizations, members of academia, scientific and technical trade associations, diagnostic laboratory companies, foreign entities (government, poultry processors, and importers), law students, State Departments of Agriculture and State representatives, members of Congress, and a risk assessment firm.

The issues that generated the most comments, both positive and negative, included those associated with FSIS’ legal authority to propose the final product standards, the proposed Salmonella levels and serotypes for the final product standards, the proposed use of SPC monitoring, the scientific and technical information used to support the proposed framework, the potential economic impacts of the proposed framework, and the potential impact of the proposed framework on small poultry growers and processors. Several comments also suggested alternative approaches other than the proposed framework for addressing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products.

While FSIS continues to support the goal of reducing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products, the Agency believes that the comments have raised several important issues that warrant further consideration. Therefore, FSIS is withdrawing the “Salmonella Framework for Raw Poultry Products” proposed rule and proposed determination to allow the Agency to further assess its approach for addressing Salmonella illnesses associated with poultry products.